Family law, out of court.

Your family is restructuring.

You will get through this. Keep looking forward.

Start a conversation
A house above the water at sunset. One wing stands in raw new timber framing; the finished rooms beside it are warmly lit.

The choice

When you work things out by agreement, the law is a fine woodworking tool. When someone else decides, it becomes a chain saw.

A hand plane taking a fine shaving off a length of timber, curls of wood on the bench, water and trees beyond the window.

Every family matter gets settled one of two ways. The people in it decide together, or somebody outside it decides for them: a judge, an arbitrator, a stranger working from a file.

I only do the first kind. I don’t go to court. The agreements I help people reach are ones they had a hand in building, which is usually why they hold.

Some matters do have to be decided by someone else. If yours is one of them I will say so early, and I will help you find the right person for it. Better you hear that in week one than after a retainer.

Working together

As your lawyer, or as the neutral between you.

There are two ways I can be involved. They suit different situations, and you don’t need to know which one you want before you get in touch.

A path through coastal forest dividing into two routes, both running on toward the water and the evening light beyond.

As your lawyer

You don’t need anyone’s agreement to begin. I act for you. That means advising you, helping you work out what is realistic, and negotiating on your behalf, all of it outside court.

Choose this if you want someone on your side who still won’t set the whole thing alight.

As the neutral

When you and your partner both want to reach an agreement, I can work with you together as a mediator.

In that role I am not acting as either person’s lawyer. I am responsible to both of you at once, and to the family the agreement has to work for.

I can do either, but never both on the same matter. Once I have acted for one of you, I cannot then be the neutral between you. Worth knowing before either of you calls.

Young people

If you have children, they have one family, and you and your partner will always be in it.

That stays true no matter what else changes. What you settle over the next few months will shape how that family works for your children for years afterwards.

Hear the Child

My research, education and pilot practices in the mid-2000s led to founding the BC Hear the Child Society and the Child Interviewer Roster: a way for young people to put their own views to the adults deciding about them. Both are used throughout British Columbia, including in court.

How a young person is heard depends on the young person, considering their age, maturity, how comfortable they are and what is going on around them. I approach each child as unique.

The shoreline seen from low down among the grass, at about the height of a child, looking out toward the water and the hills.

Parents ask me to hear their child’s views in my mediations, or as part of preparing a formal Hear the Child Report. Professional colleagues retain me for this work on files that are not mine. Get in touch to hear from a child.

Is this for you

Am I the right lawyer for you?

The right lawyer for one person may be the wrong one for another, and it is easier to know that early. This is who my way of working suits.

  • You want an agreement you can both live with. Success here is a settlement that holds, and a family that still works afterwards. That is the work I do best.
  • You have room to work things out. Nobody’s safety is at risk, no deadline is bearing down, and there is at least a chance your partner will come to the table. If that is not where you are, tell me and I can point you to who may be able to help.
  • You are willing to see it from your children’s side. Their perspective is where my work starts, and parents who are open to it tend to get further.
  • You are choosing an approach, not an hourly rate. You will find cheaper. What you are choosing here is a way of working, and the hourly number on its own will not tell you much about what a matter ends up costing.
A heavy timber door standing open onto the water and the hills, with late light reaching across the floor.

If that sounds like you, we should talk.

About

Suzanne Strathdee Williams

I have practised law for more than three decades, and for the last decade exclusively in family law. I work as a collaborative lawyer, a mediator, and a Hear the Child interviewer.

I take a calm, constructive and creative approach: helping people resolve matters and make decisions now that build a strong restructured family future. My work draws on extensive legal, facilitation and mediation experience, and a life-long focus on supporting the rights and healthy development of children.

Before this practice I worked in a boutique family law firm, at Canada’s Department of Justice, in the Vancouver office of a national firm, at a BC Crown corporation, and at an international child-rights organisation based at a university. That range — commercial, civil, administrative, Indigenous, human and child rights — is what I bring to family matters now.

I grew up in Saskatchewan, lived in Ontario, and have spent most of my career on the West Coast. I live and work in Victoria, and I practise remotely, so I work with people anywhere in British Columbia. It also means that seeing me costs you no half day off work and no drive across town, and there is no waiting room to sit in.

Practice

  • Member of the Law Society of British Columbia and the Canadian Bar Association
  • Family Law Mediator recognised by the Law Society of British Columbia
  • Mediate BC Registered Roster Mediator
  • Qualified collaborative family lawyer — Collaborative Family Separation Professionals (Victoria), Collaborative Professionals of Canada, and the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals

Children and family justice

  • Founded the BC Hear the Child Society and the Child Interviewer Roster, now used across British Columbia
  • Formerly Deputy and Legal Director, International Institute for Child Rights and Development
  • Lead writer and consultant, the Canadian Bar Association’s Child Rights Toolkit for Lawyers
  • Chair of several Child/Youth Participation and Access to Justice for Children/Youth conferences
  • Introduced the low bono and pro bono collaborative law initiative to Victoria

Writing and education

Called and educated

  • Called to the bar in Ontario, 1995, and British Columbia, 1996
  • Juris Doctor (converted from LL.B.), University of Saskatchewan, 1993
  • BA (Honours), Western University

What others say

Throughout the experience of separation Suzanne was compassionate, professional, thorough and very service oriented. My separation was complex, emotional and involved a child with disabilities; in order to reach an agreement I needed a humanistic yet assertive lawyer with experience in negotiating an agreement that was the very best for my child. Suzanne far exceeded my expectations; I would not hesitate recommending her.

Former Client

I was a client of Suzanne Williams for a few years, and I can attest to her professionalism in facilitating the stressful, legal process of divorce. She provided unsolicited advice on options to pursue and was always timely in her responses and filings. I would highly recommend Suzanne as Counsel.

Former Client

Suzanne is very organized, effectively facilitates discussions, generates creative options, and moves things forward to completion. She possesses a deep understanding of mediation principles, conflict resolution theory and relevant legal frameworks. Her communication skills, caring, cultural sensitivity and ability to synthesize complex information and problem solve make her a valuable resource for clients and professionals alike.

Dispute Resolution Professional

Get in touch

What happens when you get in touch.

Before I can talk with you properly about your situation, I have to check two things.

Whether I am able to act. If I have already had contact with your partner, I am not permitted to act for you. That is why I ask for their full name at the start. It is a rule I am bound by, and it is better dealt with in week one than week three.

Whether anything is already scheduled. A court date or a filing deadline changes what is possible, and how fast we have to move.

So what I need first is short. Your name, your partner’s full name, a way to reach you, and any dates already fixed. The rest can wait until we speak.

Your enquiry comes to me. I read it myself.

Start a conversation

The strait at sunset, islands and hills along the far shore, the water going quiet.